Dominican Republic vs Ethiopia PDR: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Dominican Republic
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 62,056 t against 54,132 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 7,924 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 67th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 64th of 185 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,436 t | 49,257 t | 32,821 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 18,524 t | 52,183 t | 33,659 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 16,524 t | 55,637 t | 39,113 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 19,062 t | 60,960 t | 41,898 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Dominican Republic or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 62,056 t against 54,132 t in Dominican Republic as of 1992.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Dominican Republic and Ethiopia PDR?
- 7,924 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Dominican Republic and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Dominican Republic ranks 67th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 64th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).