Dominican Republic vs Sweden: Manure applied β Cropland potassium
Manure applied β Cropland potassium over time
- Dominican Republic
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 56,659 t against 54,132 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 2,527 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 75th and Sweden ranks 74th of 200 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,436 t | 119,499 t | 103,063 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 18,524 t | 96,256 t | 77,732 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 16,524 t | 92,330 t | 75,806 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 22,086 t | 83,535 t | 61,449 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 32,734 t | 72,791 t | 40,056 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 42,389 t | 65,764 t | 23,375 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 53,170 t | 57,763 t | 4,593 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland potassium, Dominican Republic or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 56,659 t against 54,132 t in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland potassium between Dominican Republic and Sweden?
- 2,527 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Sweden rank globally for manure applied β cropland potassium?
- Dominican Republic ranks 75th and Sweden ranks 74th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).