Eastern Europe vs Yugoslav SFR: Manure applied β Cropland potassium
Manure applied β Cropland potassium over time
- Eastern Europe
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Eastern Europe currently reports 2.18 million t against 363,561 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 1.81 million t.
That makes Eastern Europe's figure about 6.0 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Eastern Europe has been ahead every year.
Eastern Europe ranks 12th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 15th of 32 groups.
Eastern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Europe | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.65 million t | 364,925 t | 5.28 million t | Eastern Europe |
| 1970s | 6.51 million t | 402,319 t | 6.11 million t | Eastern Europe |
| 1980s | 7.06 million t | 408,956 t | 6.65 million t | Eastern Europe |
| 1990s | 6.81 million t | 369,599 t | 6.44 million t | Eastern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland potassium, Eastern Europe or Yugoslav SFR?
- Eastern Europe, at 2.18 million t against 363,561 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland potassium between Eastern Europe and Yugoslav SFR?
- 1.81 million t, with Eastern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Eastern Europe and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for manure applied β cropland potassium?
- Eastern Europe ranks 12th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 15th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).