Ecuador vs Ethiopia PDR: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Ecuador
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 64,336 t against 62,056 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 2,280 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ecuador ranks 62nd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 64th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia PDR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 36,158 t | 49,257 t | 13,099 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 51,313 t | 52,183 t | 870.69 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 56,041 t | 55,637 t | 403.88 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 59,780 t | 60,960 t | 1,180 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Ecuador or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ecuador, at 64,336 t against 62,056 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Ecuador and Ethiopia PDR?
- 2,280 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ecuador and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Ecuador ranks 62nd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 64th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).