Egypt vs El Salvador: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Egypt
- El Salvador
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 23,906 t against 21,535 t in El Salvador, a difference of 2,371 t.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.
Egypt ranks 91st and El Salvador ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 5 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,713 t | 14,146 t | 3,433 t | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 14,052 t | 16,671 t | 2,620 t | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 15,983 t | 15,761 t | 222.75 t | Egypt |
| 1990s | 21,387 t | 17,344 t | 4,044 t | Egypt |
| 2000s | 27,202 t | 19,269 t | 7,934 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 27,831 t | 16,698 t | 11,133 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 23,925 t | 21,544 t | 2,382 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Egypt or El Salvador?
- Egypt, at 23,906 t against 21,535 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Egypt and El Salvador?
- 2,371 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and El Salvador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and El Salvador rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Egypt ranks 91st and El Salvador ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).