El Salvador vs Slovakia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- El Salvador
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 24,505 t against 21,535 t in El Salvador, a difference of 2,970 t.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 93rd and Slovakia ranks 90th of 185 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17,216 t | 60,456 t | 43,240 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 19,269 t | 38,755 t | 19,486 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 16,698 t | 28,832 t | 12,134 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 21,544 t | 25,232 t | 3,688 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, El Salvador or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 24,505 t against 21,535 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between El Salvador and Slovakia?
- 2,970 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Slovakia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- El Salvador ranks 93rd and Slovakia ranks 90th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).