Eritrea vs Tunisia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium

Eritrea
7,228 t
in 2023
Tunisia
9,207 t
in 2023
Eritrea rank
133rd
Tunisia rank
131st

Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time

  • Eritrea
  • Tunisia
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 9,207 t against 7,228 t in Eritrea, a difference of 1,979 t.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.3 times Eritrea's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 133rd and Tunisia ranks 131st of 200 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,465 t 6,640 t 3,175 t Tunisia
2000s 5,814 t 8,584 t 2,770 t Tunisia
2010s 6,926 t 9,070 t 2,144 t Tunisia
2020s 7,222 t 9,158 t 1,937 t Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 9,207 t against 7,228 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Tunisia?
1,979 t, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Tunisia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Tunisia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
Eritrea ranks 133rd and Tunisia ranks 131st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).