Eritrea vs Yemen: Manure applied — Cropland potassium

Eritrea
7,228 t
in 2023
Yemen
7,819 t
in 2023
Eritrea rank
133rd
Yemen rank
132nd

Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time

  • Eritrea
  • Yemen
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Yemen currently reports 7,819 t against 7,228 t in Eritrea, a difference of 591 t.

That makes Yemen's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Yemen ahead.

Eritrea ranks 133rd and Yemen ranks 132nd of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Yemen Difference Ahead
1990s 3,465 t 4,176 t 710.92 t Yemen
2000s 5,814 t 5,759 t 55.55 t Eritrea
2010s 6,926 t 7,111 t 185.14 t Yemen
2020s 7,222 t 7,789 t 567.55 t Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Yemen?
Yemen, at 7,819 t against 7,228 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Yemen?
591 t, with Yemen ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Yemen?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Yemen rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
Eritrea ranks 133rd and Yemen ranks 132nd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).