Estonia vs Mozambique: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Estonia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 15,009 t against 13,225 t in Mozambique, a difference of 1,784 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 118th and Mozambique ranks 121st of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,254 t | 14,600 t | 15,655 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 17,729 t | 15,299 t | 2,430 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 16,185 t | 15,792 t | 393.23 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 15,382 t | 17,682 t | 2,301 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Estonia or Mozambique?
- Estonia, at 15,009 t against 13,225 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Estonia and Mozambique?
- 1,784 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Mozambique?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Mozambique rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Estonia ranks 118th and Mozambique ranks 121st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).