Estonia vs Papua New Guinea: Manure applied β Cropland potassium
Manure applied β Cropland potassium over time
- Estonia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 15,009 t against 13,272 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1,737 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 109th and Papua New Guinea ranks 111th of 184 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,254 t | 8,784 t | 21,470 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 17,729 t | 11,172 t | 6,557 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 16,185 t | 12,535 t | 3,650 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 15,382 t | 13,023 t | 2,358 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland potassium, Estonia or Papua New Guinea?
- Estonia, at 15,009 t against 13,272 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland potassium between Estonia and Papua New Guinea?
- 1,737 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Papua New Guinea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for manure applied β cropland potassium?
- Estonia ranks 109th and Papua New Guinea ranks 111th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).