Eswatini vs Jordan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Eswatini
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 1,864 t against 1,666 t in Eswatini, a difference of 198 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 159th and Jordan ranks 158th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,266 t | 283.47 t | 982.45 t | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 1,463 t | 629.93 t | 833.03 t | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 1,629 t | 702.39 t | 926.23 t | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 1,686 t | 1,014 t | 671.52 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 1,655 t | 1,225 t | 429.56 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1,719 t | 1,480 t | 239.42 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1,714 t | 1,789 t | 75.19 t | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Eswatini or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 1,864 t against 1,666 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Eswatini and Jordan?
- 198 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jordan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Jordan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Eswatini ranks 159th and Jordan ranks 158th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).