Ethiopia vs Japan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Japan
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 140,628 t against 130,729 t in Japan, a difference of 9,899 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Japan ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 42nd and Japan ranks 43rd of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 57,569 t | 160,493 t | 102,924 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 74,708 t | 146,649 t | 71,941 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 128,117 t | 131,489 t | 3,372 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 133,540 t | 130,938 t | 2,602 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Japan?
- Ethiopia, at 140,628 t against 130,729 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Japan?
- 9,899 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Japan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Japan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 42nd and Japan ranks 43rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).