France vs Indonesia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- France
- Indonesia
How they compare
France currently reports 784,364 t against 720,409 t in Indonesia, a difference of 63,955 t.
That makes France's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.
France ranks 8th and Indonesia ranks 9th of 200 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.08 million t | 215,643 t | 868,483 t | France |
| 1970s | 1.19 million t | 203,703 t | 984,084 t | France |
| 1980s | 1.17 million t | 285,203 t | 880,614 t | France |
| 1990s | 1.00 million t | 389,926 t | 611,224 t | France |
| 2000s | 957,253 t | 399,572 t | 557,680 t | France |
| 2010s | 893,913 t | 559,527 t | 334,386 t | France |
| 2020s | 811,063 t | 696,188 t | 114,875 t | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, France or Indonesia?
- France, at 784,364 t against 720,409 t in Indonesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between France and Indonesia?
- 63,955 t, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Indonesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do France and Indonesia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- France ranks 8th and Indonesia ranks 9th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).