Georgia vs Sierra Leone: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Georgia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 4,742 t against 4,590 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 152 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 140th and Sierra Leone ranks 141st of 200 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,513 t | 1,522 t | 5,991 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 7,476 t | 1,281 t | 6,195 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 5,310 t | 3,285 t | 2,024 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 4,920 t | 4,615 t | 305.05 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Georgia or Sierra Leone?
- Georgia, at 4,742 t against 4,590 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Georgia and Sierra Leone?
- 152 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Sierra Leone?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Sierra Leone rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Georgia ranks 140th and Sierra Leone ranks 141st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).