Germany vs Melanesia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Germany
- Melanesia
How they compare
Germany currently reports 665,601 t against 18,328 t in Melanesia, a difference of 647,273 t.
That makes Germany's figure about 36.3 times Melanesia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Germany ranks 10th and Melanesia ranks 13th of 185 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.14 million t | 6,835 t | 1.14 million t | Germany |
| 1970s | 1.19 million t | 9,215 t | 1.18 million t | Germany |
| 1980s | 1.24 million t | 11,091 t | 1.23 million t | Germany |
| 1990s | 951,286 t | 14,307 t | 936,978 t | Germany |
| 2000s | 799,287 t | 17,368 t | 781,919 t | Germany |
| 2010s | 764,055 t | 18,005 t | 746,049 t | Germany |
| 2020s | 674,116 t | 17,757 t | 656,360 t | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Germany or Melanesia?
- Germany, at 665,601 t against 18,328 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Germany and Melanesia?
- 647,273 t, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Melanesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Germany and Melanesia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Germany ranks 10th and Melanesia ranks 13th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).