Greece vs Nicaragua: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Greece
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 59,732 t against 47,290 t in Greece, a difference of 12,442 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.3 times Greece's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 68th and Nicaragua ranks 65th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 6 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 89,551 t | 19,611 t | 69,940 t | Greece |
| 1970s | 89,725 t | 26,027 t | 63,698 t | Greece |
| 1980s | 73,157 t | 16,890 t | 56,268 t | Greece |
| 1990s | 64,615 t | 19,670 t | 44,945 t | Greece |
| 2000s | 63,896 t | 50,085 t | 13,811 t | Greece |
| 2010s | 57,321 t | 55,246 t | 2,075 t | Greece |
| 2020s | 46,543 t | 59,416 t | 12,873 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Greece or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 59,732 t against 47,290 t in Greece as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Greece and Nicaragua?
- 12,442 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Nicaragua?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Greece and Nicaragua rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Greece ranks 68th and Nicaragua ranks 65th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).