Guatemala vs Serbia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Guatemala
- Serbia
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 65,354 t against 63,830 t in Serbia, a difference of 1,524 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Guatemala ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55,937 t | 96,989 t | 41,053 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 60,828 t | 82,510 t | 21,682 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 64,713 t | 72,412 t | 7,699 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Guatemala or Serbia?
- Guatemala, at 65,354 t against 63,830 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Guatemala and Serbia?
- 1,524 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Serbia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Guatemala ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).