Guatemala vs Türkiye: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Guatemala
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 69,129 t against 65,354 t in Guatemala, a difference of 3,775 t.
That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.
Guatemala ranks 67th and Türkiye ranks 65th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Türkiye in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,985 t | 62,988 t | 45,003 t | Türkiye |
| 1970s | 23,288 t | 63,249 t | 39,961 t | Türkiye |
| 1980s | 25,312 t | 60,071 t | 34,759 t | Türkiye |
| 1990s | 32,147 t | 50,607 t | 18,459 t | Türkiye |
| 2000s | 50,456 t | 45,715 t | 4,742 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 60,828 t | 57,551 t | 3,277 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 64,713 t | 72,357 t | 7,644 t | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Guatemala or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 69,129 t against 65,354 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Guatemala and Türkiye?
- 3,775 t, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Türkiye rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Guatemala ranks 67th and Türkiye ranks 65th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).