Guyana vs Puerto Rico: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Guyana
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 4,370 t against 3,735 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 635 t.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.2 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Guyana ranks 143rd and Puerto Rico ranks 144th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,010 t | 10,554 t | 8,544 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 2,552 t | 11,962 t | 9,410 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 1,579 t | 9,483 t | 7,905 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 1,848 t | 7,114 t | 5,267 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 2,680 t | 5,939 t | 3,259 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 3,814 t | 4,618 t | 804.39 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 4,302 t | 3,926 t | 375.73 t | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Guyana or Puerto Rico?
- Guyana, at 4,370 t against 3,735 t in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Guyana and Puerto Rico?
- 635 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Puerto Rico rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Guyana ranks 143rd and Puerto Rico ranks 144th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).