Haiti vs Melanesia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Haiti
- Melanesia
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 19,464 t against 18,328 t in Melanesia, a difference of 1,136 t.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Melanesia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 103rd and Melanesia ranks 104th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 6 and Melanesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,534 t | 6,835 t | 9,700 t | Haiti |
| 1970s | 20,023 t | 9,215 t | 10,808 t | Haiti |
| 1980s | 11,876 t | 11,091 t | 785.79 t | Haiti |
| 1990s | 13,347 t | 14,307 t | 960.27 t | Melanesia |
| 2000s | 18,359 t | 17,368 t | 991.43 t | Haiti |
| 2010s | 18,992 t | 18,005 t | 986.36 t | Haiti |
| 2020s | 19,394 t | 17,757 t | 1,637 t | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Haiti or Melanesia?
- Haiti, at 19,464 t against 18,328 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Haiti and Melanesia?
- 1,136 t, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Melanesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Melanesia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Haiti ranks 103rd and Melanesia ranks 104th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).