Haiti vs Zambia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Haiti
- Zambia
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 19,464 t against 17,881 t in Zambia, a difference of 1,583 t.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Haiti has been ahead every year.
Haiti ranks 95th and Zambia ranks 98th of 185 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,534 t | 2,690 t | 13,844 t | Haiti |
| 1970s | 20,023 t | 4,230 t | 15,792 t | Haiti |
| 1980s | 11,876 t | 5,412 t | 6,464 t | Haiti |
| 1990s | 13,347 t | 6,814 t | 6,534 t | Haiti |
| 2000s | 18,359 t | 8,293 t | 10,066 t | Haiti |
| 2010s | 18,992 t | 15,364 t | 3,628 t | Haiti |
| 2020s | 19,394 t | 17,295 t | 2,099 t | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Haiti or Zambia?
- Haiti, at 19,464 t against 17,881 t in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Haiti and Zambia?
- 1,583 t, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Zambia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Haiti ranks 95th and Zambia ranks 98th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).