Hungary vs Kenya: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Hungary
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 71,983 t against 67,098 t in Hungary, a difference of 4,885 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 59th and Kenya ranks 56th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 6 and Kenya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 153,985 t | 18,557 t | 135,428 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 158,859 t | 22,689 t | 136,170 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 162,782 t | 33,486 t | 129,296 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 102,846 t | 43,669 t | 59,177 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 78,346 t | 53,409 t | 24,936 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 68,448 t | 65,406 t | 3,042 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 69,434 t | 71,627 t | 2,193 t | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Hungary or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 71,983 t against 67,098 t in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Hungary and Kenya?
- 4,885 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Kenya rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Hungary ranks 59th and Kenya ranks 56th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).