Hungary vs Switzerland: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Hungary
- Switzerland
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 67,098 t against 64,727 t in Switzerland, a difference of 2,371 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 66th and Switzerland ranks 68th of 200 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 153,985 t | 87,542 t | 66,443 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 158,859 t | 91,652 t | 67,207 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 162,782 t | 88,481 t | 74,301 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 102,846 t | 79,228 t | 23,618 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 78,346 t | 71,025 t | 7,321 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 68,448 t | 68,010 t | 438.04 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 69,434 t | 65,019 t | 4,415 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Hungary or Switzerland?
- Hungary, at 67,098 t against 64,727 t in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Hungary and Switzerland?
- 2,371 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Switzerland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Switzerland rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Hungary ranks 66th and Switzerland ranks 68th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).