Iceland vs Montenegro: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Iceland
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 5,917 t against 5,260 t in Iceland, a difference of 657 t.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 138th and Montenegro ranks 135th of 200 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,164 t | 8,735 t | 3,571 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 5,263 t | 7,238 t | 1,975 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 5,205 t | 6,042 t | 837.8 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Iceland or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 5,917 t against 5,260 t in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Iceland and Montenegro?
- 657 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Montenegro rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Iceland ranks 138th and Montenegro ranks 135th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).