Israel vs Luxembourg: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Israel
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 5,841 t against 5,149 t in Israel, a difference of 692 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 139th and Luxembourg ranks 136th of 200 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,723 t | 5,751 t | 1,029 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 5,278 t | 5,955 t | 676.78 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 5,297 t | 5,947 t | 650.19 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Israel or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 5,841 t against 5,149 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Israel and Luxembourg?
- 692 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Luxembourg rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Israel ranks 139th and Luxembourg ranks 136th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).