Israel vs Sierra Leone: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Israel
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Israel currently reports 5,149 t against 4,590 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 559 t.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 139th and Sierra Leone ranks 141st of 200 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,721 t | 830.14 t | 890.56 t | Israel |
| 1970s | 2,937 t | 1,021 t | 1,916 t | Israel |
| 1980s | 3,856 t | 1,289 t | 2,566 t | Israel |
| 1990s | 3,841 t | 1,520 t | 2,321 t | Israel |
| 2000s | 4,723 t | 1,281 t | 3,442 t | Israel |
| 2010s | 5,278 t | 3,285 t | 1,993 t | Israel |
| 2020s | 5,297 t | 4,615 t | 681.71 t | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Israel or Sierra Leone?
- Israel, at 5,149 t against 4,590 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Israel and Sierra Leone?
- 559 t, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Sierra Leone rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Israel ranks 139th and Sierra Leone ranks 141st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).