Jamaica vs Puerto Rico: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Jamaica
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 3,735 t against 3,167 t in Jamaica, a difference of 568 t.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 136th and Puerto Rico ranks 133rd of 185 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,962 t | 10,554 t | 7,592 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 4,533 t | 11,962 t | 7,429 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 4,701 t | 9,483 t | 4,782 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 3,733 t | 7,114 t | 3,382 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 3,662 t | 5,939 t | 2,278 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 3,382 t | 4,618 t | 1,236 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 3,217 t | 3,926 t | 709.4 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Jamaica or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 3,735 t against 3,167 t in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Jamaica and Puerto Rico?
- 568 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Puerto Rico rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Jamaica ranks 136th and Puerto Rico ranks 133rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).