Jordan vs Polynesia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Jordan
- Polynesia
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 1,960 t against 1,864 t in Jordan, a difference of 96 t.
That makes Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 158th and Polynesia ranks 156th of 200 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 283.47 t | 801.61 t | 518.14 t | Polynesia |
| 1970s | 629.93 t | 1,138 t | 508.43 t | Polynesia |
| 1980s | 702.39 t | 2,046 t | 1,344 t | Polynesia |
| 1990s | 1,014 t | 2,335 t | 1,320 t | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 1,225 t | 2,430 t | 1,205 t | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 1,480 t | 2,344 t | 864.78 t | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 1,789 t | 1,965 t | 175.37 t | Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Jordan or Polynesia?
- Polynesia, at 1,960 t against 1,864 t in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Jordan and Polynesia?
- 96 t, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Polynesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Polynesia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Jordan ranks 158th and Polynesia ranks 156th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).