Kazakhstan vs Ukraine: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Kazakhstan
- Ukraine
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 207,340 t against 184,997 t in Ukraine, a difference of 22,343 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Ukraine's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 26th and Ukraine ranks 29th of 200 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 258,866 t | 1.00 million t | 745,852 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 185,770 t | 476,138 t | 290,368 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 220,437 t | 299,932 t | 79,496 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 204,786 t | 215,210 t | 10,423 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Kazakhstan or Ukraine?
- Kazakhstan, at 207,340 t against 184,997 t in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Kazakhstan and Ukraine?
- 22,343 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Ukraine rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Kazakhstan ranks 26th and Ukraine ranks 29th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).