Kenya vs Kyrgyzstan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Kenya
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 73,020 t against 71,983 t in Kenya, a difference of 1,037 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kenya ranks 62nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 61st of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43,520 t | 44,631 t | 1,111 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 53,409 t | 43,881 t | 9,529 t | Kenya |
| 2010s | 65,406 t | 60,574 t | 4,832 t | Kenya |
| 2020s | 71,627 t | 71,482 t | 144.55 t | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Kenya or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 73,020 t against 71,983 t in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Kenya and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1,037 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Kenya ranks 62nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 61st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).