Kenya vs South Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Kenya
- South Sudan
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 71,983 t against 70,490 t in South Sudan, a difference of 1,493 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 62nd and South Sudan ranks 63rd of 200 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 66,258 t | 62,424 t | 3,834 t | Kenya |
| 2020s | 71,627 t | 69,079 t | 2,547 t | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Kenya or South Sudan?
- Kenya, at 71,983 t against 70,490 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Kenya and South Sudan?
- 1,493 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and South Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Kenya ranks 62nd and South Sudan ranks 63rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).