Kiribati vs Saint Lucia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Kiribati
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 173.47 t against 169.47 t in Saint Lucia, a difference of 4 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Kiribati ranks 189th and Saint Lucia ranks 190th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 72.41 t | 183.79 t | 111.38 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1970s | 77.16 t | 120.8 t | 43.64 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 83.58 t | 151.62 t | 68.04 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 90.64 t | 176.75 t | 86.11 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 131.72 t | 198.34 t | 66.62 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 160.92 t | 190.75 t | 29.82 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 172.08 t | 169.2 t | 2.88 t | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Kiribati or Saint Lucia?
- Kiribati, at 173.47 t against 169.47 t in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Kiribati and Saint Lucia?
- 4 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saint Lucia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Saint Lucia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Kiribati ranks 189th and Saint Lucia ranks 190th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).