Kuwait vs Polynesia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Kuwait
- Polynesia
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 2,461 t against 1,960 t in Polynesia, a difference of 501 t.
That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.3 times Polynesia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Polynesia ahead.
Kuwait ranks 153rd and Polynesia ranks 156th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 1 and Polynesia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 121.35 t | 801.61 t | 680.26 t | Polynesia |
| 1970s | 228.52 t | 1,138 t | 909.84 t | Polynesia |
| 1980s | 746.47 t | 2,046 t | 1,300 t | Polynesia |
| 1990s | 829.96 t | 2,335 t | 1,505 t | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 1,299 t | 2,430 t | 1,131 t | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 1,929 t | 2,344 t | 415.1 t | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 2,379 t | 1,965 t | 414.24 t | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Kuwait or Polynesia?
- Kuwait, at 2,461 t against 1,960 t in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Kuwait and Polynesia?
- 501 t, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Polynesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and Polynesia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Kuwait ranks 153rd and Polynesia ranks 156th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).