Lithuania vs Madagascar: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Lithuania
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 35,552 t against 30,502 t in Lithuania, a difference of 5,050 t.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 90th and Madagascar ranks 87th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Madagascar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72,442 t | 31,884 t | 40,559 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 47,527 t | 26,133 t | 21,394 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 38,662 t | 33,055 t | 5,606 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 31,416 t | 33,493 t | 2,077 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Lithuania or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 35,552 t against 30,502 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Lithuania and Madagascar?
- 5,050 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Madagascar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Madagascar rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Lithuania ranks 90th and Madagascar ranks 87th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).