Lithuania vs South Africa: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Lithuania
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 33,207 t against 30,502 t in Lithuania, a difference of 2,705 t.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 83rd and South Africa ranks 82nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72,442 t | 35,007 t | 37,436 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 47,527 t | 36,625 t | 10,902 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 38,662 t | 36,379 t | 2,283 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 31,416 t | 33,474 t | 2,058 t | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Lithuania or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 33,207 t against 30,502 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Lithuania and South Africa?
- 2,705 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and South Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and South Africa rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Lithuania ranks 83rd and South Africa ranks 82nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).