Malawi vs Peru: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Malawi
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 92,954 t against 79,934 t in Malawi, a difference of 13,020 t.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 50th and Peru ranks 47th of 185 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,930 t | 45,292 t | 43,362 t | Peru |
| 1970s | 2,688 t | 53,723 t | 51,035 t | Peru |
| 1980s | 3,562 t | 56,026 t | 52,465 t | Peru |
| 1990s | 4,333 t | 55,541 t | 51,208 t | Peru |
| 2000s | 7,842 t | 69,946 t | 62,104 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 34,058 t | 84,411 t | 50,353 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 72,186 t | 91,652 t | 19,466 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Malawi or Peru?
- Peru, at 92,954 t against 79,934 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Malawi and Peru?
- 13,020 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Peru rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Malawi ranks 50th and Peru ranks 47th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).