Malawi vs Uganda: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Malawi
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 80,662 t against 79,934 t in Malawi, a difference of 728 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 56th and Uganda ranks 54th of 200 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,930 t | 7,391 t | 5,461 t | Uganda |
| 1970s | 2,688 t | 10,528 t | 7,841 t | Uganda |
| 1980s | 3,562 t | 13,711 t | 10,150 t | Uganda |
| 1990s | 4,333 t | 24,961 t | 20,628 t | Uganda |
| 2000s | 7,842 t | 40,098 t | 32,256 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 34,058 t | 63,932 t | 29,874 t | Uganda |
| 2020s | 72,186 t | 79,458 t | 7,273 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Malawi or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 80,662 t against 79,934 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Malawi and Uganda?
- 728 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Uganda rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Malawi ranks 56th and Uganda ranks 54th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).