Malta vs Suriname: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Malta
- Suriname
How they compare
Malta currently reports 1,067 t against 825.91 t in Suriname, a difference of 241.09 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.3 times Suriname's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 167th and Suriname ranks 169th of 200 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 801.63 t | 646.58 t | 155.04 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 1,155 t | 746.74 t | 408.36 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 1,528 t | 944.54 t | 583.38 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 1,892 t | 1,109 t | 782.24 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 1,761 t | 782.32 t | 979.16 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 1,285 t | 880.41 t | 404.25 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 1,108 t | 884.11 t | 224.04 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Malta or Suriname?
- Malta, at 1,067 t against 825.91 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Malta and Suriname?
- 241.09 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Suriname rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Malta ranks 167th and Suriname ranks 169th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).