Mauritania vs Sri Lanka: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Mauritania
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 11,796 t against 9,746 t in Mauritania, a difference of 2,050 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Mauritania's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 118th and Sri Lanka ranks 115th of 185 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,360 t | 17,916 t | 12,557 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 4,506 t | 16,900 t | 12,394 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 4,821 t | 19,045 t | 14,224 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 5,943 t | 16,517 t | 10,574 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 7,696 t | 10,422 t | 2,726 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 8,874 t | 11,540 t | 2,666 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 9,664 t | 12,130 t | 2,466 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Mauritania or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 11,796 t against 9,746 t in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Mauritania and Sri Lanka?
- 2,050 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Sri Lanka rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Mauritania ranks 118th and Sri Lanka ranks 115th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).