Melanesia vs Slovenia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Melanesia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Melanesia currently reports 18,328 t against 18,223 t in Slovenia, a difference of 105 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Melanesia ranks 104th and Slovenia ranks 105th of 200 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14,856 t | 25,946 t | 11,090 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 17,368 t | 21,804 t | 4,436 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 18,005 t | 19,781 t | 1,775 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 17,757 t | 18,914 t | 1,157 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Melanesia or Slovenia?
- Melanesia, at 18,328 t against 18,223 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Melanesia and Slovenia?
- 105 t, with Melanesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and Slovenia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Melanesia ranks 104th and Slovenia ranks 105th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).