New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- New Zealand
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 15,981 t against 15,960 t in New Zealand, a difference of 21 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 184 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,296 t | 8,438 t | 858.37 t | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 10,178 t | 12,728 t | 2,551 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 10,420 t | 12,744 t | 2,324 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 12,076 t | 13,414 t | 1,337 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 14,666 t | 13,663 t | 1,004 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 17,027 t | 14,364 t | 2,663 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 16,370 t | 15,056 t | 1,314 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, New Zealand or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 15,981 t against 15,960 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
- 21 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- New Zealand ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).