Nicaragua vs Serbia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Nicaragua
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 63,830 t against 59,732 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 4,098 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 72nd and Serbia ranks 70th of 200 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54,367 t | 96,989 t | 42,622 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 55,246 t | 82,510 t | 27,264 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 59,416 t | 72,412 t | 12,995 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Nicaragua or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 63,830 t against 59,732 t in Nicaragua as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 4,098 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Serbia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Nicaragua ranks 72nd and Serbia ranks 70th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).