Nigeria vs Sudan (former): Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Nigeria
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 149,403 t against 143,481 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 5,922 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sudan (former) ahead.
Nigeria ranks 39th and Sudan (former) ranks 41st of 200 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18,494 t | 21,579 t | 3,085 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 26,744 t | 29,507 t | 2,763 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 41,513 t | 46,820 t | 5,307 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 70,071 t | 75,041 t | 4,970 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 97,919 t | 133,900 t | 35,982 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 113,126 t | 144,970 t | 31,844 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Nigeria or Sudan (former)?
- Nigeria, at 149,403 t against 143,481 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Nigeria and Sudan (former)?
- 5,922 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Nigeria and Sudan (former) rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Nigeria ranks 39th and Sudan (former) ranks 41st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).