North Macedonia vs Saudi Arabia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- North Macedonia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 12,345 t against 10,207 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 2,138 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Saudi Arabia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 114th and Saudi Arabia ranks 117th of 185 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20,894 t | 4,433 t | 16,460 t | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 18,560 t | 6,216 t | 12,345 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 18,793 t | 8,403 t | 10,390 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 14,461 t | 10,169 t | 4,292 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, North Macedonia or Saudi Arabia?
- North Macedonia, at 12,345 t against 10,207 t in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between North Macedonia and Saudi Arabia?
- 2,138 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Saudi Arabia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- North Macedonia ranks 114th and Saudi Arabia ranks 117th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).