North Macedonia vs Sri Lanka: Manure applied β Cropland potassium
Manure applied β Cropland potassium over time
- North Macedonia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 12,345 t against 11,796 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 549 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 114th and Sri Lanka ranks 115th of 184 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20,894 t | 15,990 t | 4,904 t | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 18,560 t | 10,422 t | 8,138 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 18,793 t | 11,540 t | 7,253 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 14,461 t | 12,130 t | 2,331 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland potassium, North Macedonia or Sri Lanka?
- North Macedonia, at 12,345 t against 11,796 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland potassium between North Macedonia and Sri Lanka?
- 549 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Sri Lanka rank globally for manure applied β cropland potassium?
- North Macedonia ranks 114th and Sri Lanka ranks 115th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).