North Macedonia vs Togo: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- North Macedonia
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 13,221 t against 12,345 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 876 t.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 123rd and Togo ranks 122nd of 200 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20,894 t | 4,071 t | 16,823 t | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 18,560 t | 5,676 t | 12,884 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 18,793 t | 9,653 t | 9,140 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 14,461 t | 12,688 t | 1,773 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, North Macedonia or Togo?
- Togo, at 13,221 t against 12,345 t in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between North Macedonia and Togo?
- 876 t, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Togo?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Togo rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- North Macedonia ranks 123rd and Togo ranks 122nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).