Republic of Moldova vs Uzbekistan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 480,188 t against 16,146 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 464,042 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 29.7 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 14th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 18 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48,195 t | 184,110 t | 135,916 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 27,656 t | 218,152 t | 190,497 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 20,873 t | 364,787 t | 343,915 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 16,040 t | 462,023 t | 445,984 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Republic of Moldova or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 480,188 t against 16,146 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Republic of Moldova and Uzbekistan?
- 464,042 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Uzbekistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 14th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).