Rwanda vs Saudi Arabia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 10,207 t against 9,554 t in Rwanda, a difference of 653 t.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 130th and Saudi Arabia ranks 128th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 4 and Saudi Arabia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,313 t | 519.14 t | 793.65 t | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 1,889 t | 1,139 t | 749.57 t | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 2,577 t | 2,754 t | 177.34 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 2,881 t | 4,257 t | 1,376 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 5,972 t | 6,216 t | 243.9 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 13,465 t | 8,403 t | 5,061 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 12,307 t | 10,169 t | 2,138 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Rwanda or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 10,207 t against 9,554 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Rwanda and Saudi Arabia?
- 653 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Saudi Arabia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Rwanda ranks 130th and Saudi Arabia ranks 128th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).