Serbia vs Sweden: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Serbia
- Sweden
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 63,830 t against 56,659 t in Sweden, a difference of 7,171 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 63rd and Sweden ranks 66th of 185 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96,989 t | 69,988 t | 27,002 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 82,510 t | 65,764 t | 16,746 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 72,412 t | 57,763 t | 14,648 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Serbia or Sweden?
- Serbia, at 63,830 t against 56,659 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Serbia and Sweden?
- 7,171 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sweden?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Sweden rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Serbia ranks 63rd and Sweden ranks 66th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).