South America vs Uzbekistan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- South America
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
South America currently reports 2.31 million t against 480,188 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1.83 million t.
That makes South America's figure about 4.8 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, South America has been ahead every year.
South America ranks 8th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 29 groups.
South America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South America | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.16 million t | 184,110 t | 1.97 million t | South America |
| 2000s | 2.34 million t | 218,152 t | 2.12 million t | South America |
| 2010s | 2.48 million t | 364,787 t | 2.12 million t | South America |
| 2020s | 2.29 million t | 462,023 t | 1.83 million t | South America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, South America or Uzbekistan?
- South America, at 2.31 million t against 480,188 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between South America and Uzbekistan?
- 1.83 million t, with South America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South America and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do South America and Uzbekistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- South America ranks 8th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).